Categories
Fiction

Instigative Journalist Makes News for Over Twenty Years

Herman Fording undercover with 80’s heavy metal / motocross group, Berms and Perms - humor

Herman Fording is a legend in the journalism community, famous for delivering the goods on some of the most unusual and confusing stories of the last twenty years. When the World Monetary Tracking Computer Network crashed, Fording was there. When Jane Fonda put her hat in the ring for the ‘88 presidential election, Fording was there. When the last known strain of so-called ‘buffalo-pocks’ bacteria disappeared from Los Alamos and the first new outbreak in a century was recorded, Fording was there…

An interview with Herman Fording, former journalist for the Dissociated Press.
Featured in Superstar Journalist Illustrated.
Reprinted without permission.

Herman Fording is a legend in the journalism community, famous for delivering the goods on some of the most unusual and confusing stories of the last twenty years. When the World Monetary Tracking Computer Network crashed, Fording was there. When Jane Fonda put her hat in the ring for the ‘88 presidential election, Fording was there. When the last known strain of so-called ‘buffalo-pocks’ bacteria disappeared from Los Alamos and the first new outbreak in a century was recorded, Fording was there.

Now Fording is here with me, in a small greasy diner that gives the every appearance of being constructed exclusively for furtive exchanges of spies, reporters, and cholesterol salesmen. In this most appropriate setting we begin our interview.

Star Power

Fording deep undercover with 80’s heavy metal / motocross group, Berms and Perms, days before their now infamous ‘Eat my Dust’ world tour.

SJI: You describe yourself as an instigative journalist. What exactly does that mean?

HF: I’m glad you asked, people are always mistaking me for an investigative journalist which is totally inaccurate, and totally annoying. What I do is completely different.

“To do my job properly, I have to get at the news while it’s still steaming, and you just can’t do that by waiting for stories to drop.”

SJI: How?

HF: Hmm?

SJI: How is it different?

HF: I don’t understand what your getting at.

SJI: Could you expand a little? Maybe tell us what instigative journalism is?

HF: Well, it’s what I do. It’s what I live for. It’s me. If I’m not instigating, I’m journalizing. If I’m not journalizing, I’m unconscious. That’s my life.

SJI: Noted news authority, Bertauld Krautman has defined instigative journalism as “the sage and highly pragmatic philosophy of progressive news organizations which acknowledges the fact that in order to maintain news circulation, something reportable has to happen, and further declares that it is in the best interest of reporters for that something to happen before five o’clock.” Do you feel that describes you?

HF: Yes, definitely. Traditional journalism is the only business that just waits for business to happen. Progressive reporters like myself take cues from the other major industries, we’re proactive. I go out and shake the newsmakers until they spit up news, and then, with unflinching commitment, I funnel that still warm news straight to the viewers, consumers, and news junkies. To do my job properly, I have to get at the news while it’s still steaming, and you just can’t do that by waiting for stories to drop.

SJI: What about editors? Doesn’t someone look at your stories before they go to press?

HF: When you’re good, and I am good, you don’t need anyone looking over your shoulder worrying about bias and accuracy, asking you if so-and-so really said this and actually did that. I’m a professional journalperson, if I said it happened, that’s good enough for anyone.

SJI: Don’t you worry about lawsuits or disciplinary action of some kind?

HF: This isn’t a job for the timid or the faint of spleen, this is instigative journalism. This is a man’s job, unless you’re a woman, and even then its helps to growl in a deep voice and shave your upper lip. It’s a lifestyle, and to do this right you have to pitch your tent right on the edge, and stay there until you fall off or get results. Like I said, people don’t want their news sanitized by overzealous media gatekeepers, they want the real deal, fresh from the battle. And that takes risk, it takes dedication to the craft, and Prozac.

The real payoff comes from a job well done. From audiences disgusted with the newsmakers for doing what they did, with newsmakers disgusted with themselves for trusting me, with other journalists disgusted with me because I got the scoop that they were afraid to dirty their hands with. That’s what makes it all worthwhile.

Puppy Smuggler
Fording, (at right) deep within the notorious Cambodian puppy farming underground.

SJI: I hear you are becoming a commentator, will you miss reporting from the trenches?

HF: Not as much as it will miss me. (spits out coffee, laughing at his own joke) Seriously though, some people feel that you take up commentating because you’re better at opinions than facts, but that’s not true for me. For me it’s a well earned promotion, and a big responsibility. I had to get a bigger desk to hold all my comments, and a secretary to hold all my calls because I was so busy commentating. Right now I’m looking for a bigger shelf to hold all my awards, for when I get them, and a safe place to hold all the money I’m making. I’ve narrowed it down to either an offshore account or a new mattress.

SJI: What field will you cover?

“It’s really not fair to deprive some people of my input just because something isn’t ‘my field.'”

HF: I know that some guys like to stick to niches or specialties, but I’m going to comment on everything. It’s really not fair to deprive some people of my input just because something isn’t “my field.” My comments are of value across all fields, in fact they operate as a sort of informational currency. For example, when comparing stories, reporters will often rate them according to the Fording scale. They might give an average story two Fordings, or a really good story four and a half Fordings. You never really see many five Fording stories though, unless they’re about me. But I’m sure you’ll get a five for this one. If you don’t screw it up too bad.

SJI: Thank you for your confidence. Do you have any last thoughts for our readers?

HF: Yes, let me remind them that quality doesn’t come by accident. You don’t just fall into the lap of brilliance. Unless you trip over me. (coughs up more coffee, laughing) No, you have to study and apply yourself. Read everything you can find about journalism. My new autobiography is a great place to start. It is recently revised with additional chapters covering the last few weeks, which should be of great significance to most everyone. In fact if you order today, you will receive a free subscription to email updates of my life story as they occur. Act quickly though, there has been a huge response to the book. Mostly in Romania, but I’m expecting it to catch on in English speaking countries as well.

Don’t miss any of Herman Fording’s fact-optional reports:
Medical Mayhem
How To Write Sensational Headlines
Simply Stunning Examples of Sensational Headlines
Cetaceans Strike Back – Terror From the Deep
Rouge Agent Flips Canada The Bucket

9 replies on “Instigative Journalist Makes News for Over Twenty Years”

Bryan, you are so right. Five Fordings for sure. It’s just too bad that there is not a +/- scale in operation here because it would be five+ without a doubt! Love the undercover outfit. Note the beautiful mullet!

Yes friends, Fording is a consummate professional. When he goes undercover, not a single little bit of him remains behind. It is this dedication to craft that has made him what his is today: Antisocial, unbalanced, and neurotic.

I think Faux, I mean Fox News uses the Fording scale.

Is Mr. Fording married?…I would like to introduce him to himself.

The tragic revelation of the Cambodian puppy farming expose (and a point completely missed by Fording) was the total failure of the operation.

It seems that even before this tragedy was exposed it had already succumbed to what was apparently the poor practices and lack of training of the simple hill people enlisted to farm the puppies.

Apparently there was some lack of understanding that resulted in them (the puppies) being planted too deep and too far apart for a successful crop.

In an effort to be fair I attempted to contact Fording to give him a chance to respond to the allegations raised by his failure to report these facts. However, the desk clerk at the motel 6 in Pompeno Fl (his last known address) stated he was no longer there and they in fact had “turned off the light” for Mr. Fording.

John O.

John,

Mr. Fording conveys his thanks for your interest and your willingness to serve as a source for him, but asks that you not mention your “discovery” to the Pulitzer Committee until they have finalized his selection.

Just between us, I knew he was doing something wrong in Cambodia. I tried to tell him that puppies must always be planted barking-side up, but he never listens to me.

As for his whereabouts, the last time he checked in he said something about being wrapped up in a story about the Burmese Python population of the everglades.

-Brent

Comments are closed.